Science, Technology... The Future!

  • Random
  • Archive
  • RSS
Photo: One lone astronaut floating above the curve of the Earth’s atmosphere… #space #photography
astronomynerd:

“To Fly Free in Space” (via APOD: 2012 January 1)
I think this is my favorite picture ever.
Pop-upView Separately

Photo: One lone astronaut floating above the curve of the Earth’s atmosphere… #space #photography

astronomynerd:

“To Fly Free in Space” (via APOD: 2012 January 1)

I think this is my favorite picture ever.

Source: astronomynerd

    • #photography
    • #space photography
    • #astronaut
    • #ground control to Major Tom
  • 4 months ago > astronomynerd
  • 17
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

Indiana votes against knowledge by shoehorning #religion into #science class

Yesterday, after almost no debate, the Indiana State Senate approved a bill that would allow its schools to teach the origin stories of various religions when a class touches on the origin of life. It now moves on to the state’s House, where one of its cosponsors is currently the Speaker of the House.

Although the bill as written could be used to create a comparative religion class, its sponsor, Senator Dennis Kruse, has made it clear that he hopes to see it foster the teaching of creationism in science classes. The original text of the bill explicitly mentioned creation science; it has since been modified to mention a variety of religions, including Scientology. In a brief interview, Kruse expressed disdain for evolution, calling it a “Johnny-come-lately” theory.

    • #science
    • #creationism
    • #science class
    • #education
    • #theory does not mean guess
    • #ignorance
  • 4 months ago
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

How quickly could a mouse become an elephant? Size takes time. #evolution #biology #sizematters

24 million.

That’s how many generations a new study estimates it would take to go from mouse- to elephant-sized while operating on land at the maximum velocity of change.

“Big animals represent the accumulation of evolutionary change, and change takes time,” said evolutionary biologist Alistair Evans of Australia’s Monash University.

“How fast can all of these interconnected changes be made? This to me is the main question that drives why maximum evolutionary rates are fascinating,” said Evans.
Source: http://bit.ly/yvRJgt

    • #evolution
    • #biology
    • #evolutionary biology
    • #mice
    • #elephants
    • #size matters
    • #dinosaurs
  • 4 months ago
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

A 3D holographic display system made from scratch. The LEDs are controlled by a microcontroller, which receives power and commands via the slipring. A magnetic position sensor detects the ring to synchronize the rotational angle with lighting of LEDs.
Source: Research Experience in Education, Real Time Distributed Systems Lab, Texas A&M University
scienceisbeauty
Pop-upView Separately

A 3D holographic display system made from scratch. The LEDs are controlled by a microcontroller, which receives power and commands via the slipring. A magnetic position sensor detects the ring to synchronize the rotational angle with lighting of LEDs.

Source: Research Experience in Education, Real Time Distributed Systems Lab, Texas A&M University

scienceisbeauty

Source: scienceisbeauty

    • #holography
    • #led holography
    • #science
    • #blue
  • 4 months ago > scienceisbeauty
  • 150
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
clearscience:

We mentioned storing electricity in a battery. A battery stores energy electrochemically, meaning that electrons are “stored” in a chemical with high energy. Any chemistry that involves electrons as reactants and products is electrochemistry. A fuel cell is similar to a battery: both have two electrodes (anode and cathode) and an electrolyte.
There is more than one way to distinguish a battery and a fuel cell:
Batteries store their chemicals inside the battery, while fuel cells are fed from outside. 
Fuel cells often involve catalysis, while batteries may not.
Fuel cells operate continuously. Batteries operate in a batch manner, i.e. charge/discharge.
Pop-upView Separately

clearscience:

We mentioned storing electricity in a battery. A battery stores energy electrochemically, meaning that electrons are “stored” in a chemical with high energy. Any chemistry that involves electrons as reactants and products is electrochemistry. A fuel cell is similar to a battery: both have two electrodes (anode and cathode) and an electrolyte.

There is more than one way to distinguish a battery and a fuel cell:

  1. Batteries store their chemicals inside the battery, while fuel cells are fed from outside. 
  2. Fuel cells often involve catalysis, while batteries may not.
  3. Fuel cells operate continuously. Batteries operate in a batch manner, i.e. charge/discharge.

Source: clearscience

    • #science
    • #batteries
    • #fuel cells
    • #how energy storage works
    • #electrochemical energy
  • 4 months ago > clearscience
  • 38
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

U.S. military now has a smart bullet that can travel over a mile and change direction to find its target

From the unfortunate use of interesting technology department, the United States military has recently developed a self-guided bullet, able to twist, turn, and travel over a mile before it hits its target.

Sandia National Laboratories has long been at work with the United States military developing the ultimate “smart bullet.” It announced today that a successful prototype of the bullet was created and tested at distances of over a mile (about 2,000 meters). Sandia’s new technology features a dart-like “smart bullet” that allows for unprecedented movement while in flight.

The bullets are able to communicate with sensors that communicate with the bullet, allowing it to steer and maneuver to its destination.

    • #science
    • #self-guided bullet
    • #military
    • #smart bullet
    • #future weapons
  • 4 months ago
  • 4
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
jtotheizzoe:

What do you smell like? I mean, really smell like? And WHY do you smell like you smell like?
The natural odors of most animals, besides those like skunk musk, are actually a result of bacteria digesting certain secretions and releasing tell-tale scent compounds. When dogs smell each others’ rear ends, they aren’t really smelling each other (so to speak), they are smelling the characteristic odor products.
But why? The obvious reason is that it provides an odorous fingerprint, a tell-tale tail-tell. Dogs, primates and many other animals smell each other to identify strangers from those they know. Do humans do it? We evolved off of all fours long ago, so having scent glands “down below” wouldn’t do us much good, unless you wanted to bend over in the street to say hello. But we do have quite a garden of smells going on up above, in our armpits and chests.
It turns out that people can be identified by their chest and armpit bacterial odors using an “electronic nose”. It also turns out that we think people with more diverse immune genes smell better than those who are genetically closer to us, a sign that we use our nose to pursue genetic diversity. And most women can tell you some tale of sensitivity to smells when pregnant or ovulating. Some research even indicates that we can smell sick people! Is this why we nuzzle our noses into the napes of necks when getting romantic? To test the smelly waters?
And what about our species’ proclivity toward perfume? Here’s what Rob Dunn theorizes:

Then there is a final piece to this story, the issue of subterfuge. Very early in our human history, we began to take advantage of smells produced elsewhere in nature to perfume our bodies. We think of perfume as lovely in moderation, but there is another way to think of perfume, as a way to cheat. When you apply deodorant or perfume, you are covering up the odors produced by your bacteria with an odor regarded as pleasant, at least to the conscious brain and perhaps, if the perfume and deodorant companies have done their jobs, to the subconscious too, which is important since that seems to be where the decisions are being made11.  I’m not sure where this leaves us other than with the impression that nearly the entirety of modern humanity has figured out how to smell like a peacock. Beware both the wolf in sheep’s clothing and the Gonorrhea that smells like Old Spice.

For more, check out: Sick People Smell Bad: Why Dogs Sniff Dogs, Humans Sniff Humans, and Dogs Sometimes Sniff Humans
(via Scientific American)
View Separately

jtotheizzoe:

What do you smell like? I mean, really smell like? And WHY do you smell like you smell like?

The natural odors of most animals, besides those like skunk musk, are actually a result of bacteria digesting certain secretions and releasing tell-tale scent compounds. When dogs smell each others’ rear ends, they aren’t really smelling each other (so to speak), they are smelling the characteristic odor products.

But why? The obvious reason is that it provides an odorous fingerprint, a tell-tale tail-tell. Dogs, primates and many other animals smell each other to identify strangers from those they know. Do humans do it? We evolved off of all fours long ago, so having scent glands “down below” wouldn’t do us much good, unless you wanted to bend over in the street to say hello. But we do have quite a garden of smells going on up above, in our armpits and chests.

It turns out that people can be identified by their chest and armpit bacterial odors using an “electronic nose”. It also turns out that we think people with more diverse immune genes smell better than those who are genetically closer to us, a sign that we use our nose to pursue genetic diversity. And most women can tell you some tale of sensitivity to smells when pregnant or ovulating. Some research even indicates that we can smell sick people! Is this why we nuzzle our noses into the napes of necks when getting romantic? To test the smelly waters?

And what about our species’ proclivity toward perfume? Here’s what Rob Dunn theorizes:

Then there is a final piece to this story, the issue of subterfuge. Very early in our human history, we began to take advantage of smells produced elsewhere in nature to perfume our bodies. We think of perfume as lovely in moderation, but there is another way to think of perfume, as a way to cheat. When you apply deodorant or perfume, you are covering up the odors produced by your bacteria with an odor regarded as pleasant, at least to the conscious brain and perhaps, if the perfume and deodorant companies have done their jobs, to the subconscious too, which is important since that seems to be where the decisions are being made11.  I’m not sure where this leaves us other than with the impression that nearly the entirety of modern humanity has figured out how to smell like a peacock. Beware both the wolf in sheep’s clothing and the Gonorrhea that smells like Old Spice.

For more, check out: Sick People Smell Bad: Why Dogs Sniff Dogs, Humans Sniff Humans, and Dogs Sometimes Sniff Humans

(via Scientific American)

Source: blogs.scientificamerican.com

    • #genetics
    • #genetic compatibility
    • #perfume
    • #dogs sniffing butts
    • #reproduction
  • 4 months ago > jtotheizzoe
  • 256
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

AR goggles make crime scene investigation a desk job

Once AR goggles are AR contact lenses, no one will ever need to leave home… ;)

“CRIME scene investigators could one day help solve murders without leaving the office. A pair of augmented reality glasses could allow local police to virtually tag objects in a crime scene, and build a clean record of the scene in 3D video before evidence is removed for processing.

The system, being developed by Oytun Akman and colleagues at the Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands, consists of a head-mounted display receiving 3D video from a pair of attached cameras controlled by a laptop carried in a backpack. This arrangement lets the wearer see their surroundings as normal while also allowing them to overlay virtual objects, which are placed using hand gestures.”

    • #crime
    • #ar
    • #science
  • 4 months ago
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
ikenbot:

How Long Does It Take for Earth’s Magnetic Field to Reverse?
As end of the world scenarios begin to ramp up with 2012 now in play, I figured it would be timely to post one of the debunk facts about the switching of our magnetic field reversal which some believe to occur in a matter of days. Most of the folks who believe this we’re likely duped by another 2012 site.
The time it takes for Earth’s magnetic field to reverse polarity is approximately 7000 years, but the time it takes for the reversal to occur is shorter at low latitudes than at high latitudes, a geologist funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) has concluded. Brad Clement of Florida International University published his findings in this week’s issue of the journal Nature. The results are a major step forward in scientists’ understanding of how Earth’s magnetic field works.
The magnetic field has exhibited a frequent but dramatic variation at irregular times in the geologic past: it has completely changed direction. A compass needle, if one existed then, would have pointed not to the north geographic pole, but instead to the opposite direction. Such polarity reversals provide important clues to the nature of the processes that generate the magnetic field, said Clement.
Since the time of Albert Einstein, researchers have tried to nail down a firm time-frame during which reversals of Earth’s magnetic field occur. Indeed, Einstein once wrote that one of the most important unsolved problems in physics centered around Earth’s magnetic field. Our planet’s magnetic field varies with time, indicating it is not a static or fixed feature. Instead, some active process works to maintain the field. That process is most likely a kind of dynamic action in which the flowing and convecting liquid iron in Earth’s outer core generates the magnetic field, geologists believe.
Pop-upView Separately

ikenbot:

How Long Does It Take for Earth’s Magnetic Field to Reverse?

As end of the world scenarios begin to ramp up with 2012 now in play, I figured it would be timely to post one of the debunk facts about the switching of our magnetic field reversal which some believe to occur in a matter of days. Most of the folks who believe this we’re likely duped by another 2012 site.

The time it takes for Earth’s magnetic field to reverse polarity is approximately 7000 years, but the time it takes for the reversal to occur is shorter at low latitudes than at high latitudes, a geologist funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) has concluded. Brad Clement of Florida International University published his findings in this week’s issue of the journal Nature. The results are a major step forward in scientists’ understanding of how Earth’s magnetic field works.

The magnetic field has exhibited a frequent but dramatic variation at irregular times in the geologic past: it has completely changed direction. A compass needle, if one existed then, would have pointed not to the north geographic pole, but instead to the opposite direction. Such polarity reversals provide important clues to the nature of the processes that generate the magnetic field, said Clement.

Since the time of Albert Einstein, researchers have tried to nail down a firm time-frame during which reversals of Earth’s magnetic field occur. Indeed, Einstein once wrote that one of the most important unsolved problems in physics centered around Earth’s magnetic field. Our planet’s magnetic field varies with time, indicating it is not a static or fixed feature. Instead, some active process works to maintain the field. That process is most likely a kind of dynamic action in which the flowing and convecting liquid iron in Earth’s outer core generates the magnetic field, geologists believe.

Source: sciencedaily.com

    • #science
    • #Earth
    • #magnetic field
    • #magnetic poles
    • #magnetic pole reversal
    • #the sky is falling
  • 4 months ago > ikenbot
  • 330
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
'\x3ciframe width=\x22500\x22 height=\x22375\x22 src=\x22http://www.youtube.com/embed/EgrdAUFFMrA?wmode=transparent\x26autohide=1\x26egm=0\x26hd=1\x26iv_load_policy=3\x26modestbranding=1\x26rel=0\x26showinfo=0\x26showsearch=0\x22 frameborder=\x220\x22 allowfullscreen\x3e\x3c/iframe\x3e'

Scientists thought in the 1970s that this concept for a space station could be ready to become the first orbiting city by the year 2000 — a mere 35 years in the future. Now that it’s 2011 and technology has advanced tremendously, maybe we can  make up for lost time and build it in 15 years.

I don’t know about you, but I’d be in line to go up for a visit in 2026 as soon as I could.

The design is known as a Stanford torus and was first proposed during the 1975 NASA Summer Study, but reminds me of the design from Doctor Who Ark in Space, which aired in January of that same year… Hmmmm.

    • #Ark in Space
    • #Doctor Who
    • #Stanford Torus
    • #science
    • #space
    • #space habitat
    • #torus space station
  • 9 months ago
  • 4
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
← Newer • Older →
Page 1 of 3

Science, Technology... The Future!

About

Avatar

Posting articles, news, and anything related to science, technology, futurism, and pretty much any geeky thing I think is cool.

Good glayven!

Cool:

See more →
  • Photoset via the-star-stuff

    Inner Space

    Inner Space is a lovely series of photos by London-based Owen Silverwood that depicts miniaturized spacecraft blasting...

    Photoset via the-star-stuff
  • Photoset via mloo

    ernst haeckel prints

    Photoset via mloo
  • Photo via fuckyeahspaceexploration

    When you detune your TV so there is just static, about 10% of that static noise are ripples from the Big Bang. You can literally watch the beginning...

    Photo via fuckyeahspaceexploration
  • Photo via fuckyeahspaceexploration

    1964 concept art.

    Photo via fuckyeahspaceexploration
  • Video via thedailywhat
    Video

    Science Experiment of the Day: A spoon made of gallium — a substance which melts at ~86 degrees Fahrenheit — is dipped in hot water.

    Make your...

    Video via thedailywhat
  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Mobile

Links to learn from:

How to Backup --- What is Password. --- What is CPU?

Powered by Tumblr